I just realised that to find the free, GPL, version of RealVNC you have to go through a search engine, as RealVNC themselves seem to have removed all links to it from the main pages of the site. Isn't maintaining security updates good enough? - 128.97.245.130 ( talk) 00:44, 4 March 2009 (UTC) Dodgy attitude towards the GPL-version? Just because they don't feel like putting in extra features all the time doesn't mean it's outdated.
#REALVNC ENTERPRISE EDITION 4.4.2 FREE#
Dan.tsafrir ( talk) 23:59, 28 January 2009 (UTC) Maybe they're happy with the existing features they put into the Free Edition. 212.30.2.18 ( talk) 16:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC) It seems to me that the article already addresses the "outdatedness" of the free version with an appropriate citation, see item #1 in the article. Both 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 were security updates only (see ), there is no sign of any features or improvements to the free version since 4.1.1. 71.141.145.52 ( talk) 07:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC) The 4.1.3 version was the first time the free version got updated in a long time, probably since 2006 judging by the modified date on my old copy of 4.1.2.
#REALVNC ENTERPRISE EDITION 4.4.2 UPDATE#
Perhaps it's time to be more explicit about this, that is to say something to the effect of "the free version isn't updated (in a timely fashion)" in a prominent manner.? 85.227.226.236 ( talk) 00:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC) Do you have any sources on this? Last time there was an update to the version number they all got updated at the same time (on Oct. I'd say the free version is starting to lag behind the latest updates quite considerably by now.
KJRehberg ( talk) 17:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC) updates to free version? If you are putting it back, you must discuss the facts of the matter HERE. You cannot use the "Notability" tag without starting a discussion here. BetacommandBot 23:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Notability tag If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. Image:RealVNC-Logo.gif is being used on this article.